홈페이지 » 제품 소싱 » 재생에너지 » 미국 대형 유틸리티, 2035년까지 화석 연료 발전량의 절반만 대체할 계획
electricity production with fossil fuel

미국 대형 유틸리티, 2035년까지 화석 연료 발전량의 절반만 대체할 계획

The Sierra Club, an environmental group with a focus on reducing fossil fuel pollution, has graded 75 American utilities on their resource plans through 2035. The average grade was a “D.”

Big US utilities plan

Image: Consumers Energy

pv magazine USA에서

The Sierra Club has issued a report on how the resource plans of half the utilities in the United States will affect their emissions from fossil fuel combustion.

The group analyzed 75 operating utilities that are owned by the 50 utility parent companies that owned the most coal and gas generating capacity as of 2021, when the Sierra Club began its annual reporting.

The report gave six of the 75 utilities a grade of “A,” based on points awarded for planned coal retirements and renewables deployment, and points deducted for planned gas deployment.

The six companies earning an “A” grade are Public Service Company of Oklahoma, NV Energy-Nevada Power Company, NV Energy-Sierra Pacific Power Company, Entergy Arkansas, Xcel Minnesota/Wisconsin, and Northern Indiana Public Service Company.

All but the last of those six companies are owned by parent companies that received a grade of “B” or lower.

The average grade across all the utilities was “D.”

The 75 utilities plan to build 168 GW of solar and 70 GW of wind by 2035, a spokesperson said.

They plan to retire 58 GW of coal units out of the 148 GW they own, yet “only 30%” of the utilities are committed to retiring their coal generation by 2030, the report says.

The utilities plan new gas capacity totaling 93 GW.

“Only 10” of the utilities are committed to reducing their emissions by 80% by 2030, while overall, the utilities plan to replace 52% of their fossil fuel generation by 2035.

The report makes six recommendations for utilities “to improve their planning”:

  • Conduct “rigorous” modeling for generation resources and transmission. Some utilities, the report says, “have no formal integrated resource planning process.”
  • Accurately model the renewable energy options available and “incorporate the risks” of building additional fossil generation.
  • Incorporate in resource planning the federal incentives available under the Inflation Reduction Act.
  • Increase transparency in the planning processes.
  • Use all-source requests for proposals (RFPs) when seeking new generating resources.
  • “Maximize available interconnection points” and work with local governments and communities to enable renewable energy development.

The Sierra Club works to promote clean energy, said a spokesperson, noting the organization “has worked directly with utility companies to find clean energy solutions,” that it works with lawmakers on legislation like the US Inflation Reduction Act, and that it “empowers its members to use their voice and call for local changes that pave the way to a healthier, greener future.”

이 콘텐츠는 저작권으로 보호되며 재사용할 수 없습니다. 저희와 협력하고 저희 콘텐츠 중 일부를 재사용하고 싶으시다면 editors@pv-magazine.com으로 연락해 주세요.

출처 pv 잡지

면책 조항: 위에 제시된 정보는 Cooig.com과 독립적으로 pv-magazine.com에서 제공합니다. Cooig.com은 판매자와 제품의 품질과 신뢰성에 대해 어떠한 진술 및 보증도 하지 않습니다. Cooig.com은 콘텐츠의 저작권과 관련된 위반에 대한 모든 책임을 명시적으로 부인합니다.

코멘트 남김

귀하의 이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. *표시항목은 꼭 기재해 주세요. *

위쪽으로 스크롤